Nagpur Violence Over Aurangzeb’s Tomb Sparks Political Unrest

The recent eruption of violence in Nagpur over protests surrounding Aurangzeb’s tomb has sent shockwaves across Maharashtra and beyond. What began as a demonstration by right-wing groups like the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and Bajrang Dal soon spiraled into full-blown riots, leading to curfews, injuries, and political blame games. The issue has reignited historical and political debates, with accusations of premeditated violence and allegations of political exploitation. Let’s delve into what transpired, the political fallout, and its broader implications.

The Unfolding of Violence: What Really Happened?

On the night of the protests, a large gathering of right-wing activists demanded the removal of Aurangzeb’s tomb, citing his oppressive rule over Hindus. The demonstrators clashed with another group, leading to stone-pelting, arson, and attacks on police personnel. The situation soon escalated, with reports of shops and homes being specifically targeted.

• Curfew Imposed: As violence spread, authorities imposed a curfew in affected areas to prevent further unrest.

• Casualties and Arrests: At least 33 police officers and several civilians were injured. Over 50 individuals have been arrested so far, with the police investigating if the violence was pre-planned.

• Role of Chhaava Movie? Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis suggested that the recently released Bollywood film Chhaava, based on the life of Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj (Aurangzeb’s nemesis), might have contributed to tensions.

Political Fallout: Blame Game Begins

As with many such incidents, political leaders have been quick to seize the moment to further their narratives.

• BJP vs Opposition: While CM Fadnavis has called the violence a “well-planned conspiracy” against peace, opposition leaders such as Aaditya Thackeray have accused the BJP of trying to turn Maharashtra into the next Manipur.

• Uddhav Thackeray’s Statement: The Shiv Sena (UBT) leader dismissed the controversy, saying, “Why are we fighting over someone who lived 300 years ago?”

• Asaduddin Owaisi’s Criticism: AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi termed the violence an “intelligence failure,” questioning why the police failed to anticipate the riots.

• Eknath Shinde’s Comparison: Maharashtra CM Eknath Shinde compared Aurangzeb’s tomb with Osama bin Laden’s burial, arguing that glorifying controversial historical figures fuels unnecessary tensions.

Historical Significance of Aurangzeb’s Tomb

Aurangzeb, one of the most controversial Mughal emperors, ruled India with an iron fist and implemented policies that are still debated today. His tomb, located in Khuldabad, Maharashtra, has been a subject of sporadic political controversies. Unlike grand Mughal mausoleums like the Taj Mahal, Aurangzeb’s tomb is modest—reflecting his austere lifestyle in his final years.

Social Media Misinformation and Role of Extremist Groups

Misinformation played a huge role in inciting tensions. Rumors that a religious text was burned further fueled anger on the ground. The Nagpur police are investigating how WhatsApp and social media platforms were used to spread provocative messages.

• The VHP and Bajrang Dal have taken a firm stand against Aurangzeb’s tomb, claiming that celebrating his legacy is an insult to Hindus.

• On the other hand, Muslim leaders have condemned the violence and called for maintaining communal harmony.

Looking Ahead: Will the Violence Impact Maharashtra Politics?

With the 2026 Maharashtra elections approaching, many believe this incident will become a major campaign issue. Some political analysts argue that the BJP and its allies might use this controversy to consolidate their voter base, while the opposition will highlight law-and-order failures under the current government.

The Nagpur violence raises critical questions about how history is used for present-day politics. As Maharashtra reels from the aftermath, the real challenge lies in preventing such incidents from recurring.